911 Loose Change
I've only watched a couple of minutes of
this documentary so far but that was already enough to give me the creeps. This documentary about the 9/11 events is 100% based on footage broadcasted by the regular media at that dreadful day (and quite often removed in repeat broadcasts). If only every American would watch
this film...
www.loosechange911.com
bookmarking
Commentary
Join the discussion! Leave a comment through the below!
Got something to add to this?
Feel free to leave a comment on this site. You can use Textile and Emoticons. Your email address is only used to show a gravatar. Please stay on-topic and use common decency. Spammers will be shot in front of a live studio audience.
If you plan on posting code, use pastebin please and post a URL to the code. The comment processing doesn't deal very well with code. Sorry for the inconvenience.
Human comment spammers: don't bother posting your crap here. Comments are moderated and I won't let any of your shit through.
Trackbacks
If you have an interesting related post on your own site you can leave a trackback. As they say: 'a little AJAX a day keeps the spammers away' which is why you'll have to click below to generate a trackback key. The key will be valid for 15 minutes and can be used only once.
At 21 March '06 - 07:09 Bram wrote:
At 21 March '06 - 08:10 stefan wrote:
I definitely support the recommendation for people to watch the documentary.
At 21 March '06 - 12:26 Kenneth wrote:
At 24 March '06 - 12:07 GRID8400 wrote:
At 24 March '06 - 15:21 GRID8400 wrote:
At 25 March '06 - 13:44 Christian Montoya wrote:
At 25 March '06 - 14:06 Marco wrote:
At 26 March '06 - 00:06 Matthijs wrote:
Personally I think the evidence presented is convincing. However, I cannot confirm that the facts presented are true. For example, is it true that a) using mobile phones from an aircraft was not possible at that time? b) The pentagon had indeed a hole the size of which was too small for a boeing hitting it. I personally don’t have tapes from the broadcasts so I cannot check this. c) the steel in the towers could not have melted from the fire? d) the collapsing of the building 7 was not caused by the other tower falling on it?
But because anyone who wants to can have access to the original broadcasts, these things can be investigated. That’s one reason I have some doubts about this. If these things can be so easily checked, why hasn’t this been in the news so much?
Also, the thing with (conspiracy) theories like these is that if you start with a certain believe (in this case the government has something to do with the attacks) and then start looking for evidence, if you search enough you’ll find it. It’s the same with UFO’s. Once you believe in them you’ll find evidence everywere. People with photo’s, films, eye witnesses, experts with good explanations, etc etc.
Well, it’ll be interesting to see how this develops, to say the least.
At 26 March '06 - 02:10 GRID8400 wrote:
At 26 March '06 - 03:35 Matthijs wrote:
At 29 March '06 - 21:20 fly4life wrote:
At 30 March '06 - 19:37 mark wrote:
http://www.oilempire.us/loose-change.htm..
THE REAL ISSUES OF COMPLICITY
WHERE Flight 77 hit – the nearly empty, recently reconstructed and strengthened sector
WHAT hit the Pentagon – Flight 77, probably electronically hijacked
HOW the air defenses did not protect the Pentagon, even after the towers had been hit
WHO scheduled multiple war game exercises, including a “plane into building” scenario
WHY 9/11 was allowed to happen (and given technical assistance)
A list of films with best evidence of 9/11 complicity is at http://www.oilempire.us/movies.html
Denial Stops Here: From 9/11 to Peak Oil and Beyond
The Truth and Lies of 9/11
The Great Conspiracy: the 9/11 News Special You Never Saw
9/11 Citizens Commission (New York City, 9/9/2004)
http://www.oilempire.us/pentagon-truth.h.. – 9/11 activists debunk the “Pentagon Missile” hoax
http://www.oilempire.us/pentagon-hole.ht.. – the “small hole” claims are false
http://www.oilempire.us/pentagon-photos... – photos of Boeing debris
http://www.oilempire.us/state.html
politics and psychology of 9/11 disinformation
At 02 April '06 - 04:43 Jim in CA wrote:
Has anyone read “Watchmen”? This reminds me of that plot.
At 05 April '06 - 11:22 joe wrote:
towers explosion was inconsistent with demolition footage. towers exploded top down, the weight of the upper floors crushed lower floors level by level.
also inconsistent and biased reporting on pentagon. a far greater preponderance of people said they saw commercial jetliner crash pentagon. and somehow he disproportionately showed one person say commercial plane and all other accounts say helicopter or army plane. don’t be defrauded by a loser with a crackpot thesis who gathers one sided info to support his specious claim
At 07 April '06 - 17:08 Creepyfox wrote:
Do a little research.
Even 911 conspiracy theorists roll their eyes at this one.
At 15 April '06 - 23:01 Cara wrote:
At 16 April '06 - 12:31 Suppa K wrote:
At 20 April '06 - 10:12 lightmuzik wrote:
At 29 April '06 - 20:21 Cindy wrote:
At 06 May '06 - 12:20 Bernie wrote:
I see the posts are already old. I hope the frenezy is not ever yet and that people are still sharing the movie with the ones they know. That is what I am doing.
At 06 May '06 - 14:23 Alex wrote:
there are many reasons why the media won’t pick this up.
1. No one in the higherr up has yet to support this, no one has attachted their name to it, although i like what the maker is doing who is he to cause an investigation of 9/11
2. The theory is so unbelieveable and unreal that many would be afraid to agree with it, the idea that the government would attack its own people is “proposterious” when I looked at the edivence I realized how scary it is, and it put me into shock.
3. Media doesn’t liek to take chances, they just print facts and dont like to get into trouble. There was a man named “Tricky” Dick Nixon. Little did people know he planned had people attempt to steal important documents about him. when Woodword and Bernstein (two reporters working for Washington Post news at the time) came up with this story it was put down by most people, most eventually realized the truth after but, WASHINGTON POST LOST CONSERVATIVE PATRONS, and had to take a large risk, there is really no incentive for the media to show a documentary of 9/11 like this
4. All of the judging of the facts seems to be left up to viewers, not experts, he asks you why something looks strange yet no experts agree…..
At 07 May '06 - 11:39 Gemini Jackson wrote:
At 10 May '06 - 07:50 Suppa K wrote:
At 13 May '06 - 17:09 Stephen James Sakamoto wrote:
Now there are some who will criticise me for using examples from TV Shows and maybe bring up some interesting Lyrics… but I believe that ART, Music, Shows and Performances reveal a lot more than one can summise on their own. I have been in tuned to this spiritual malady since I was really young… around 13 years old with great songs by Sham 69’s – ‘Tell The Children’, The Clash’s – ‘Washington Bullets’, The Damned’s – ‘In Dulce Decorum’, The Stranglers’ – ‘Who Wants The World’, The Lords Of The New Church’s – ‘Open Your Eyes’
and many other artists who have spoken out against tyranny through the medium of music…
The Lords Of The New Church
» Open Your Eyes(Bator/James)
Video games train the kids for war. Army chic in high-fashion
stores.
Law and order’s done their job. Prisons filled while
the rich still rob.
Assassination politics. Violence rules within’ our nation’s midst.
Well ignorance is their power tool. You’ll only know what they want you to know.
The television cannot lie. Controlling media with smokescreen eyes. Nuclear politicians picture show. The acting’s lousy but the blind don’t
know.
They scare us all with threats of war. So we forget just how bad things are.
You taste the fear when you’re all alone. They gonna git’cha when you’re on your own.
The silence of conspiracy. Slaughtered on the altar of apathy.
You gotta WAKE UP from your sleep. ‘Cause meek inherits earth…six feet
deep.
OPEN YOUR EYES SEE THE LIES RIGHT IN FRONT OF YA.
Open your eyes see the lies right in front of ya.
Open your eyes…..
Like these bands who have chosen to speak out and speak to you as a human being and the potential of YOU becoming the MEDIA and make a movie, CD or DVD of music, Events, Protests, Actions, and Drumming Concerts! We all must stand up and make our own way, we must make huge sacrifices for the future and the children of tomorrow. Do something locally and tell your friends via the Internet… tell everyone and go out and DO IT! Pass It Forward your Video, CD, DVD or whatever your choice of MEDIA... Make the revolution a reality!
“Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.” – John Fitzgerald Kennedy
Stephen James Sakamoto
At 26 August '06 - 22:06 Fresh wrote:
At 27 August '06 - 03:12 supp k wrote:
But I doubt the truth will be heard, Its happened so long go, nd so man people seemo be able t“debunk” it, and espcially with all these filsm its even harder making it seems as if the whole tragidy was fine and dandy and that nowwe make movies of the heroes that where involved in it, makes you wonder why no one seems to care that now 2 movies are on it. its only been about 5 years, thats not that lng, espcially not long enough to make TWO movies about it, and have no one seem to care.
At 21 December '06 - 19:16 morenice wrote:
At 02 January '07 - 12:05 Big A wrote:
At 07 February '07 - 07:05 Liviu wrote:
This whole mumbo jumbo is so pathetic it makes me want to gag. I did an extensive Google research, searching both blogs and news media websites. All the theories melt away like butter. I’m sure if you believe something with everything you got, it’s very easy to not see the facts clearly. All you care is the facts that props up your theories.
Controlled demolishion? How many of you know anything about controlled demolishion. They blow up the building from the bottom up, not from top down. Every fractions of a second a new series of bombs blows, going all the way up the building. The building falls down like a sand castle.
I guess these demolishion bomb guys were very extremely smart, they blew the WTC backwards.
What a bunch of crock! You guys who believe in this junk needs to wake up. Theories without substance or evidence is not truth, it’s mere speculation. Speculation is not evidence.
Thank-you!
At 07 February '07 - 07:53 Liviu wrote:
One only has to open up a Genetics Book to come to the conclusion that the Simple Cell, as Evolutionists so glamorously put it, it extremely complicating. The Simple Cell, can feed itself, it can repair itself, it can duplicate itself, besides this it has a highly complex communication system that searches the DNA for information of how to do all the stuff I just mentioned. Somehow, the RNA knows how to read and interpret the DNA code. Does that sound simple to you?
All Life is made of dead matter. How can Nature by Itself organize dead matter into a life is beyond me. Nature can’t even build a simple log cabin. How much more complicating and organized is a “Simple Cell” compared to a Log Cabin? To simply put it, Evolutionists basically believe that disorganized matter, organized, disorganized matter. Of course, they don’t say that, but that is what is logically implied.
Coming back to these 9/11 Theories. Don’t believe them, until you first check out the other-side of the fence. You might be surprised what you find there. I would be absolutely mad if someone was trying to pass truth as lies. Wouldn’t you?
Thanks Again!
At 07 February '07 - 07:59 Liviu wrote:
Sorry!
At 19 February '07 - 23:58 mind1ilL wrote:
At 28 February '07 - 17:31 kramer wrote:
At 11 March '07 - 18:16 hmm? wrote:
At 13 March '07 - 03:33 PhYk wrote:
Phyk
DJ/Webmaster of http://www.nosmusic.org
At 22 March '07 - 18:50 sean wrote:
http://www.INFOWARS.com
listen to the radio for some good information
At 16 July '07 - 11:00 hi wrote:
At 19 April '08 - 22:37 psikeyhackr wrote:
The peculiar thing about these buildings is that they are VERY TALL.
Now the people who design these building have to carefully decide how much concrete and steel to put on every level. Every level must be strong enough to support the combined weights of all levels above. The designers know this. So if a 175 ton airliner supposedly causes a 500,000 ton building to collapse straight down doesn’t it make sense to ask the TONS of STEEL and TONS of CONCRETE that were on every level? Shouldn’t that be easy because it had to be documented to construct the building?
So why aren’t EXPERTS asking that and getting answers to such obvious questions after SIX YEARS?
psik
At 26 October '09 - 03:58 brueck wrote:
where is the first edition of “loose change” – it is the only one that “asks questions and demands answers”!